Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit d14414dd authored by Philip Mueller's avatar Philip Mueller
Browse files

There was an error in the description.

I was confused about the maximum marker displacement.
I have now checked it with the ini file and fixed it.
parent 55756436
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
......@@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ In the last section, we have studied how \emph{linear} momentum is conserved, no
There is an important historical fact, that we would like to discuss here.
At the beginning \emph{these} systems, were the default systems.
However we had trouble in understand the results.
As a solution, we decided to increase the temporal resolution, by shrinking the maximal marker displacement to $0.01$.
As a solution, we decided to increase the temporal resolution, by shrinking the maximal marker displacement to $0.02$.
This has indeed solved the issue and allowed us to understand the results much better.
}.
......@@ -292,7 +292,7 @@ In the last section, we have studied how \emph{linear} momentum is conserved, no
The values are normalized with respect to the \emph{theoretical} angular momentum, given by \eqref{eq:experiments:angMom:theory:body:DiscLx}.
The dashed line shows the system in which we have used a larger time step\footnote
{
As a short reminder, in these systems the maximal marker displacement is not $0.01$ but $0.06$ grid widths in each direction.
As a short reminder, in these systems the maximal marker displacement is not $0.02$ but $0.06$ grid widths in each direction.
We show only the results using the Jenny--Meyer integrator, since the other three are quite similar.
}.
%
......
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Please register or to comment